ARCHIVE · RANDOM · ASK

IS MINIC A GHEARR TEANGA DUINE A SCORNACH


"before i live with other folks, i've got to live with myself. the one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience."


FRITH-FAISISTEACH




Saturday January 28th - 2:39pm

noiiir:

You mean the home that you could only buy because the bank gave you the money to buy it, which you are unable to repay and due to the conditions of the contract that you signed they are allowed to take back?

You mean taking on the definition that home is but private property and that a house should not be a right to ensure the safety and welfare of people, simply a commodity? You mean the money people have to take from banks because of the capitalist system whereby they are given insufficient money for their labour and therefore have to beg for money from a rich elite who unfairly own that money? You mean the banks who have systemically played a role in destroying the social conditions, the political system and economic climate of the country? You mean the contract and laws defined by the powerful elites designed specifically to protect private property and elitist rights for the rich and to disregard basic rights - rights not defined by those in power who can define the law - of the masses? You mean the “free-will” and “consent” people give by signing these contracts that they’re forced to give in the current system because without doing that they’re thrown out into the streets and told to fuck off by the system itself?
I’m sorry. I missed your point.

noiiir:

You mean the home that you could only buy because the bank gave you the money to buy it, which you are unable to repay and due to the conditions of the contract that you signed they are allowed to take back?

You mean taking on the definition that home is but private property and that a house should not be a right to ensure the safety and welfare of people, simply a commodity? You mean the money people have to take from banks because of the capitalist system whereby they are given insufficient money for their labour and therefore have to beg for money from a rich elite who unfairly own that money? You mean the banks who have systemically played a role in destroying the social conditions, the political system and economic climate of the country? You mean the contract and laws defined by the powerful elites designed specifically to protect private property and elitist rights for the rich and to disregard basic rights - rights not defined by those in power who can define the law - of the masses? You mean the “free-will” and “consent” people give by signing these contracts that they’re forced to give in the current system because without doing that they’re thrown out into the streets and told to fuck off by the system itself?

I’m sorry. I missed your point.

15 notes tags: occupy belfast occupy belfast ireland capitalism anti-capitalism

  1. k-dev reblogged this from tiocfaidharlulz
  2. cingawoof reblogged this from tiocfaidharlulz
  3. tiocfaidharlulz reblogged this from noiiir and added:
    My alternative economic model would be a socialist one, but I’m not really bothered getting into that debate with you...
  4. noiiir reblogged this from tiocfaidharlulz and added:
    You clearly are missing the point, allot of points, but hey, lets all pretend that free market capitalism is the worse...
  5. tiocfaidharlulz posted this

powered by tumblr themed by weconfideinwolves